• E-ISSN 2732-7167

vol_5_issue_3_2023_77_78

vol_5_issue_3_2023_77_78 595 793 Heljves | Hellenic Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery

Fenestrated and branched endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms – status quo and perspectives

Available Online: September, 2023
Page: 77-78

Author for correspondence:

Spyridon Mylonas, MD, MSc, PhD, FEBVS
Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
Email: spyridon.mylonas@uk-koeln.de

doi: 10.59037/38g8j528
ISSN 2732-7175 / 2023 Hellenic Society of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Published by Rotonda Publications
All rights reserved. https://www.heljves.com

Spyridon Mylonas1, Konstantinos Moulakakis2
1 Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne Germany
2 Vascular Surgery Department, Patras University Hospital, Patras, Greece

The use of fenestrated- branched stent-graft to treat aortic aneurysms was born in 1999 from the need to expand EVAR indications to patients with short necks and poor infrarenal sealing zones. Over the time surgeons have grown more confident in their ability to treat patients with extended aortic disease. Matsagkas et al in this retrospective single center study present the 30-day results of 74 patients with aneurysmal disease treated with fenestrated and/or branched endovascular repair (F/BEVAR) from 2018 to 2023. To date, this is by far the largest study from Greece on the topic, and the authors are to be congratulated for their results and this important effort to elucidate this complex aortic procedure.1

Almost 50% of the patients were treated with off-the-self devices confirming the anatomic suitability of the available off-the-self branched stent -grafts. Several studies have reported an anatomic suitability of the available off-the-self branched stent-grafts in percentages ranging from 50 to 63% with adjunct maneuvers.2,3 The vast majority of patients (81%) were treated in an elective setting, while sixteen (21.6%) patients were treated for failed-EVAR (endovascular aneurysm repair). Technical challenges of F/BEVAR after failed EVAR include imaging difficulties, stiffness of the EVAR stent graft and the friction between the grafts, presence of bare metal stents and suprarenal fixation and the distance between the renal arteries and the flow divider of the EVAR stent-graft.4 However, the authors reported an excellent primary technical success rate of 98.6%. A single fenestration for a renal artery could not be cannulated through a femoral approach and was successfully incorporated though an upper extremity approach in a second procedure.

Indeed, upper extremity access (UEA) can offer advantages when target vessels are caudally-oriented. For endografts with downward directional branches UEA has been judged unavoidable, and discussions have focused on the preferred side of UEA.5,6 Whereas some operators prefer left-sided UEA with the argument of reduced manipulation in the aortic arch and assumed reduced risk of stroke, other operators prefer the right sided UEA because of the assumed better workflow and lower radiation dose. However, recent experience has demonstrated that with the use of steerable sheaths, even four-branched repairs in the challenging TAAA anatomy could be performed from the femoral access alone.7 UEA was used in all B -EVAR cases without postoperative cerebrovascular events or access related complications.

In this mixed cohort study, including juxtarenal, pararenal AAAs, as well as, TAAAs of various extent, the 30-day mortality was 8.1%, underlining the impact of aortic pathology extent as risk factor for early mortality. A recent meta-analysis on FEVAR for juxtarenal AAAs reported a pooled early postoperative mortality rate of 3.3% (95 % c.i. 2.0 to 5.0).8 In a recent clinical study, including 468 patients with predominantly TAAAs of various extent and pararenal AAAs, the 30-day mortality was 4.9%. In this last study the mortality was higher for Crawford types I to III TAAAs compared with infradiaphragmatic repairs and was associated with age, chronic kidney disease and initial TAAA preoperative diameter.9

A total of 272 target vessels (TV) were incorporated into the repairs using balloon expandable as well as self-expanding covered stents. The authors reported an excellent primary TV patency at 30-days of 99.2%. Postoperatively, thrombotic occlusion of 2 renal arteries was observed, which were successfully recanalized without clinical consequences.1 Incorporation and patency of TV after F/B-EVAR is a critical issue. It has been observed that renal mating stents are performing worse compared to those of the coeliac trunk or superior mesenteric artery and fenestrations perform better compared to branches in the medium and long term.10,11 Movement of the renal artery during the respiratory cycle, which usually occurs at a distance of 15 mm distally of the renal artery ostium may contribute to mating stent instability or even occlusion.10 When a fenestration design is planned the mating stent rarely reaches this deep, whereas much deeper landing is usual with branches.

A final important point that merits further consideration is the rate of spinal cord ischemia (SCI) after F/B-EVAR. Van Calster K et al reported a SCI rate of 3.8% among 468 patients treated with predominantly TAAAs of various extents and pararenal AAAs.9 In the study by Matsagkas et al a 4% SCI rate was observed.1 In four patients the celiac artery was left unstented as the patients were deemed high-risk, and was subsequently stented in a second stage operation. In fact, among the suggested strategies for SCI prevention is the temporary sac perfusion branch, with plan of subsequent occlusion/incorporation in a second stage. Limitations of perfusion branches are the potential risks of increased sac pressure due to poor outflow through small segmental arteries and disseminated intra-vascular coagulopathy from large endoleak into a blind sac.12 Three patients developed postoperatively SCI; 2 of them permanent grade 3. In addition, two patients developed ipsilateral lower limb reperfusion syndrome leading to amputation in one of them. Large transfemoral sheaths are associated with limb and pelvic ischemia, which may aggravate spinal cord ischemia because of compromised collateral networks. Increasing evidence indicates that minimizing lower limb and pelvic ischemia may improve outcomes of complex endovascular repair including lower risk of paraplegia.13 This can be achieved by placing an antegrade sheath connected into the larger transfemoral sheath creating a shunt, especially when the procedure is planned to last more than 3h.

In summary, Matsagkas et al in this single-center study reported favourable 30-d outcomes of F/B-EVAR for complex aortic aneurysms.1 Patient selection, meticulous technique, and optimal perioperative patient care are critical factors determining a favourable outcome. Each of these steps requires a steep learning curve to be mastered, and the excellent results of this study confirm the center’s acquired experience. Moreover, a number of reports have shown the association between surgeon and hospital volume for almost every major operation. The impact of hospital and surgeon volume is even greater for repair of TAAAs. However, for major procedures, coordinated care involves multiple disciplines including the surgeon, operating room staff, anesthesia, critical care, and nursing. Each of these entities works cohesively to ensure optimal care.

  1. Matsagkas M, Kouvelos G., Spanos K, Tzimkas-Dakis K, Bareka M, Chaidoulis A, Arnaoutoglou E, Giannoukas A. Early outcomes of fenestrated and/or branched endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms (F/B-EVAR); A single-center experience. Hell J Vasc Endovascular Surgery
  2. Bisdas T, Donas KP, Bosiers M, Torsello G, Austermann M. Anatomical suitability of the T-branch stent-graft in patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms treated using custom-made multibranched endografts. J Endovasc Ther. 2013;20(5):672-7.
  3. Zimmermann A, Menges AL, Rancic Z, Meuli L, Dueppers P, Reutersberg B. E-nside Off-the-Shelf Inner Branch Stent Graft: Technical Aspects of Planning and Implantation. J Endovasc Ther. 2022;29(2):167-74.
  4. Budtz-Lilly J, D’Oria M, Gallitto E, Bertoglio L, Kolbel T, Lindstrom D, et al. European Multicentric Experience With Fenestrated-branched ENDOvascular Stent Grafting After Previous FAILed Infrarenal Aortic Repair: The EU-FBENDO-FAIL Registry. Ann Surg. 2023;278(2):e389-e95.
  5. Mirza AK, Oderich GS, Sandri GA, Tenorio ER, Davila VJ, Karkkainen JM, et al. Outcomes of upper extremity access during fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2019;69(3):635-43.
  6. Scott CK, Driessen AL, Gonzalez MS, Malekpour F, Guardiola GG, Baig MS, et al. Perioperative neurologic outcomes of right versus left upper extremity access for fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2022;75(3):794-802.
  7. Makaloski V, Tsilimparis N, Rohlffs F, Spanos K, Debus ES, Kolbel T. Use of a Steerable Sheath for Retrograde Access to Antegrade Branches in Branched Stent-Graft Repair of Complex Aortic Aneurysms. J Endovasc Ther. 2018;25(5):566-70.
  8. Jones AD, Waduud MA, Walker P, Stocken D, Bailey MA, Scott DJA. Meta-analysis of fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgical repair of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms over the last 10 years. BJS Open. 2019;3(5):572-84.
  9. Van Calster K, Bianchini A, Elias F, Hertault A, Azzaoui R, Fabre D, et al. Risk factors for early and late mortality after fenestrated and branched endovascular repair of complex aneurysms. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2019;69(5):1342-55.
  10. Suh GY, Choi G, Draney MT, Herfkens RJ, Dalman RL, Cheng CP. Respiratory-induced 3D deformations of the renal arteries quantified with geometric modeling during inspiration and expiration breath-holds of magnetic resonance angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;38(6):1325-32.
  11. Resch T, de Vries J-P, Haulon S. Optimising Target Vessel Patency after Complex Aortic Repair: Things We Know that We Know. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2021;62(1):4-6.
  12. Mezzetto L, Scorsone L, Silingardi R, Gennai S, Piffaretti G, Mantovani A, et al. Bridging Stents in Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: A Systematic REVIEW. Ann Vasc Surg. 2021;73:454-62.
  13. Youssef M, Salem O, Dunschede F, Vahl CF, Dorweiler B. Adjunct Perfusion Branch for Reduction of Spinal Cord Ischemia in the Endovascular Repair of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;66(3):233-9.
  14. Maurel B, Delclaux N, Sobocinski J, Hertault A, Martin-Gonzalez T, Moussa M, et al. The impact of early pelvic and lower limb reperfusion and attentive peri-operative management on the incidence of spinal cord ischemia during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm endovascular repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;49(3):248-54.

    Privacy Preferences

    When you visit our website, it may store information through your browser from specific services, usually in the form of cookies. Here you can change your Privacy preferences. It is worth noting that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our website and the services we are able to offer.

    Click to enable/disable Google Analytics tracking code.
    Click to enable/disable Google Fonts.
    Click to enable/disable Google Maps.
    Click to enable/disable video embeds.
    Our website uses cookies, mainly from 3rd party services. Define your Privacy Preferences and/or agree to our use of cookies.